Please sign the Embassy's Guestbook
Visitors since October 14, 2006
|
|
In the book of “personality rights” of Peter Raue with the sub-title “the defense of the personal honour” is located that it is not permitted to quote private enamels or letters publicly it is, this concerns a person of contemporary history.
One may not quote thus without permission of the person concerned enamels publicly on its web page.
One may not certainly spread true facts also publicly if they concern the intimate and Privatsphäre a person. One may mention such true facts over the private and intimate lives only with the agreement of the person concerned publicly.
That means, one may not write for example that a certain person has a schizophrenen brother, even if the fact is true.
Times accepted, someone would be actually psychologically ill, then that may not mention anybody publicly without permission of the concerning.
The criminal offence of slandering is given if an untruth is expressed knowingly and word by word in writing or verbally. - That is, a slandering cannot be interpreted into a letter inside.
If thus someone states publicly that it was slandered, it must prove that the accused of person would have expressed and would have spread an untruth word by word publicly over it.
Who is actually slandered, an action to restrain interference and a smart money of the slanderer can request with the responsible district court by an attorney and/or a woman barrister.
Evelin Cervenkova
Lakota Oyate information
Reference work
Author: Peter Raue
Title: Personality rights
Sub-title: The defense of the personal honour
Author: Professor Dr. Marian Paschke
Title: Law of communication media
Springer publishing house
Back to the Hompage - Lakota Oyate information
|
|