OAS logo
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
OKLAHOMA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE
Library Digitization Homepage
OAS Homepage
Copyright
Search
Volume 79—1999

{Page 85}

New Maximum Age of Bigmouth Buffalo, Ictiobus cyprinellus

Craig P. Paukert1 and James M. Long
Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit
Department of Zoology, Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078

1 Current address: Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007

INTRODUCTION and METHODS

Introduction and Methods Results and Discussion References Top of Page Table of Contents Home

Bigmouth buffalo, Ictiobus cyprinellus, inhabit large rivers and reservoirs from Saskatchewan, Canada to the Gulf of Mexico, including eastern Oklahoma (1). This species has long had commercial value (2); however, limited information on their age exists. The oldest reported bigmouth buffalo was 20 yr (696 mm total length) from a Saskatchewan Lake (3). Maximum size has been reported as 36 kg and 914 mm (1,4). Although Scott and Crossman (5) suggested bigmouth buffalo can exceed 20 yr of age, we know of no records to support this. In most waters maximum reported age has been less than 10 yr (6,7).

We collected bigmouth buffalo in Keystone Reservoir, Oklahoma, a 10,600 ha impoundment of the Arkansas and Cimarron rivers west of Sand Springs, Oklahoma. We used 152- and 203-mm bar measure monofilament gill nets set throughout the reservoir. Each bigmouth buffalo collected was measured (total length, mm) and the lapillus otolith removed by making a cut through the cranium from the dorsal region of the head just above the operculum. Otoliths were embedded in EMBed-812 (Electron Microscopy Services, Fort Washington, PA), sectioned in the sagittal plane to 30-µm of thickness with a low speed diamond blade saw, sanded and polished, and interpreted under a dissecting scope with transmitted light. Annuli were interpreted as the opaque bands surrounding the kernel of the otolith. Because we had no bigmouth buffalo of known-age, we are assuming that these opaque bans were annuli. Two individuals independently interpreted the otoliths and recorded their ages. Ages were assigned when two readers agreed on an age. When agreement could not be reached, the more conservative (the younger) of the two ages was assigned.

RESULTS and DISCUSSION

Introduction and Methods Results and Discussion References Top of Page Table of Contents Home

A total of six bigmouth buffalo (856-950 mm) were collected and aged (Table 1). Ages of these fish ranged from 19 to 26 yr, with five of the six fish exceeding 20 yr, the maximum reported age for bigmouth buffalo (6). Although age validation was not performed in our study and, to our knowledge, never with buffalo fishes, otoliths have been validated for other catostomids (e.g. white sucker, Catostomus commersoni)(8). Crowding at the edge and accumulation at the kernel of the otolith made it difficult to interpret and count annuli accurately. Consequently, our estimates may underestimate the true age.

Our findings indicated that bigmouth buffalo can attain ages greater than 20 yr and may exceed this age by a considerable margin.

{Page 86}

Although we aged otoliths from only six fish, many larger bigmouth buffalo were observed in gill netting efforts in Keystone Reservoir in 1996 and 1997 (C. Paukert Oklahoma State University, personal observation). Given the maximum size of 914 mm and 36 kg, we believe many bigmouth buffalo populations may contain fish older than 20 yr.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Chad McCoy, Regina Attebury, and Terry Malloy helped in field collections. Dr. Bill Fisher and two anonymous reviewers provided comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Financial support for this publication was provided by the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act under Project F-41-R of the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation and Oklahoma State University. We thank the Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit for providing logistical and financial support for this project. The Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit is a cooperative program of the U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division; the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation; Oklahoma State University; and the Wildlife Management Institute.

REFERENCES

Introduction and Methods Results and Discussion References Top of Page Table of Contents Home

1.   Miller RJ, Robison HW. The fishes of Oklahoma. Stillwater (OK): Oklahoma State University Press; 1973. 246 p.

2.   Robison HW, Buchanan TM. Fishes of Arkansas. Fayetteville (AR): University of Arkansas Press; 1988. 536 p.

3.   Johnson RP. Studies on the life history and ecology of the bigmouth buffalo, Ictiobus cyprinellus (Valenciennes). J Fish Res Bd Canada 1963;20:1397-1429.

4.   Pflieger WL. The fishes of Missouri. Columbia (MO): Missouri Department of Conservation; 1991. 343 p.

5.   Scott WB, Crossman EJ. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fish Res Bd Canada Bull 1973;184:557-560.

6.   Carlander KD. Handbook of freshwater fishery biology, volume one. Ames (IA): Iowa State University Press; 1969. 752 p.

7.   Hesse LW, Wallace CR, Lehman L. Fishes of the channelized Missouri: age-growth, length-frequency, length-weight, coefficient of condition, catch curves and mortality of 24 species of channelized Missouri River fishes. Lincoln (NE): Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Technical Series, Report 4. Lincoln (NE); Nebraska game and Parks Commission: 1978. 61 p. Available from Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln.

8.   Thompson KR, Beckman DW. Validation of age estimates from white sucker otoliths. Trans Amer Fish Soc 1995;124:637-639.

Received: August 5, 1998 Accepted: February 10, 1999

Introduction and Methods Results and Discussion References Top of Page Table of Contents Home